Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Oskar feels that his dentist caused nerve damage to his teeth and tongue during a recent visit because Oskar's tongue is still numb ten days after his visit and his tooth fell out. Because Oskar feels he suffered damages as a result of his dentist's breach of her duty of care, Oskar can bring a negligence case against the dentist based on ________.


A) malfeasance
B) mistake
C) malpractice
D) criminal misconduct
E) workplace mishap

F) A) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the purpose of damages in tort law? When can a plaintiff receive damages in a negligence case? What types of damages are usually available?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Damages are the final required element f...

View Answer

Which type of damages are NOT available when bringing an action for negligence?


A) Compensatory.
B) Punitive damages
C) Nominal damages.
D) Damages intended to reimburse a plaintiff for actual losses.
E) Pain and suffering compensation.

F) C) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The CEO of a peanut company knows that its products test positive for salmonella but sell the peanuts away. Consequences can include:


A) Only criminal prosecution of the CEO.
B) Only government-mandated bankruptcy and restructuring of the peanut company.
C) Potential criminal charges against the CEO, as well as civil lawsuits brought by injured victims.
D) Only lawsuits brought by victims, and never criminal charges.
E) Neither criminal nor civil prosecution because of assumption of the risk.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under which of the following does the court determine the percentage of fault of the defendant, requiring that the defendant be more than 50% at fault before the plaintiff can recover?


A) Assumption of the risk.
B) Last-clear-chance.
C) Modified comparative negligence.
D) Pure comparative negligence.
E) Both modified comparative negligence and last-clear-chance.

F) B) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Good Samaritan statutes impose liability upon people for refusing to stop at accident scenes.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Once a plaintiff proves the elements of res ipsa loquitur, the defendant will automatically lose the case against them.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Breach of duty in a negligence case refers to ________.


A) The standard of care a reasonable person owes to another.
B) A failure to live up to the standard of care a reasonable person owes to others.
C) Actual harm, or cause in fact, which results from a failure to live up to a standard of care.
D) Legal cause, or the extent to which the defendant is held responsible for actions that fall short of the standard of care.
E) An obligation to measure compensable losses suffered by the plaintiff.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In some situations, the law specifies the duty of care one individual owes to another.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a plaintiff cannot establish all four elements of a negligence claim, what result should the plaintiff expect?


A) The plaintiff can prevail as long as the plaintiff successfully showed causation and damages, even if the plaintiff did not prove breach of duty.
B) The plaintiff can prevail if the court believes the defendant should be punished for his conduct, even though a plaintiff could not establish all four elements of a negligence claim.
C) The plaintiff can prevail at the discretion of the judge if the judge believes it is too difficult for the plaintiff to meet the burden of proof.
D) The plaintiff will be denied recovery due to a failure to establish all four elements of a negligence case.
E) The plaintiff will be denied recovery only if the judge cannot subpoena the necessary witnesses to come and testify in court.

F) A) and B)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Luann voluntarily stops to render aid to a biker on the side of the road who had been hit by a car. As Luann pulls over she partially blocks the view of oncoming cars. A car driven by Kellip hits Luann's car, further injuring the biker. If the biker sues Luann for their additional injuries, what statute might be a defense for Luann?


A) Motorist Safety to Yield statute.
B) Aid to Others statute.
C) Good Samaritan statute.
D) Assumption of the Risk statute.
E) Clear the Danger statute.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Assuming res ipsa loquitur is established, what is the effect of that doctrine?


A) It requires a finding of negligence.
B) It prohibits a finding of negligence.
C) The burden of proof shifts to the plaintiff.
D) The burden of proof shifts to the defendant.
E) The burden of proof rises to proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A fan at a baseball stadium is hit by a baseball. Under what circumstances could the owner of the stadium be held liable for resulting injuries?


A) If the stadium owner failed to fulfill its duty to provide reasonable protection because there were no barriers or other measures taken to protect game attendees from being struck by the ball.
B) In all circumstances where a ball hits game attendees, regardless of any other factors.
C) If the stadium owner took all cost-effective precautions but failed to take part in a multi-million dollar research effort to construct a robot to intercept foul balls.
D) If the baseball team was the home team and not the visiting team.
E) If the owner of the stadium was aware of a chance that a ball would strike a patron and failed to cancel the game, despite the risk.

F) A) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the final required element of a negligence action?


A) Proving reasonableness.
B) Seeking damages.
C) Arguing assumption of the risk.
D) Receiving punitive damages.
E) A defendant paying a prevailing plaintiff's legal fees.

F) C) and D)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When a defendant in a negligence suit avoids liability due to an unforeseen event that interrupts the causal connection between the defendant's breach of duty and the damages the plaintiff suffered, this is known as a(n) ________.


A) assumption of the risk
B) contributory negligence
C) comparative negligence
D) superseding cause
E) good Samaritan cause

F) C) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Causation has which two elements?


A) Actual cause and real cause.
B) Actual cause and significant cause.
C) Actual cause and proximate cause.
D) Premiere cause and significant cause.
E) Proximate cause and real cause.

F) All of the above
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

It is a generally accepted precaution for dentists to warn patients of risks and exercise extra caution when patients are on anticoagulants (blood thinners) and must undergo dental procedures. A dentist fails to alert a patient (who the dentist knows is on anticoagulants) of the risks of a procedure the patient is about to undergo that is dangerous to someone on blood thinners. The patient experiences near-fatal bleeding due to the procedure. The plaintiff decides to sue for malpractice but the dentist says he was unaware of the need to warn patients on blood thinners of possible risks. Is the dentist going to be successful in his defense?


A) Yes, as long as the dentist can prove he did not know about the risks.
B) Yes, as long as the dentist did not make any specific mistakes during the dental procedure.
C) Yes, as long as the dentist can prove that the risks are overstated.
D) Yes, because malpractice cases require intentional harm for a victim to prevail.
E) No, because a professional cannot defend against a negligence suit by claiming ignorance of generally accepted principles in his or her field of expertise.

F) All of the above
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following refers to the extent to which, as a matter of policy, a defendant may be held liable for the consequences of his actions?


A) Proximate cause.
B) Actual cause.
C) Cause in fact.
D) Significant cause.
E) Legal cause.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Proximate cause is determined by ________, in most states.


A) Actual cause
B) Common law
C) Foreseeability
D) But-for causation
E) Strict liability

F) C) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A plaintiff in a negligence lawsuit may choose whether the plaintiff wishes pure comparative negligence or modified comparative negligence rules to be applied by the court.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer